If
your RTUs are located where the associated antenna cannot visually see
the SCADA master radio station's antenna, it is not clear whether the
radio signals will make the journey reliably. When the two radio
station antennas are within optical view of each other, the radio path
is considered line of sight. When they are not, they are referred to as
path critical. Path critical is not a matter to be taken lightly.
Guessing incorrectly about RF signal quality can cause errors in cost
estimations, taller antenna support structures that cost more, and
potential delays in turn-up time. It can also cost frustration with
contractors and a sense that the engineer really did not know what they
needed to know about this aspect of the project. It takes time to build
a taller antenna support structure — especially when you created an
initial structure that was too low and now has to be removed. If
the SCADA radio network designer chooses to perform a radio study, they
can enjoy a report that lets the end user try the actual SCADA radio
network design before they buy it, so to speak. The designed antenna
heights get tested to see if they facilitate reliable communications at
20 dB fade margin. A radio study places the actual SCADA radio network
hardware out in the field. The actual radio models are used — it is
often practical to use slightly smaller antennas during the study, and
the differences between as-studied and as-built antennas are negated
with a math formula to compensate. The master radio station and its
associated antenna system are located at the initially designed height,
along with the RTU sites to be studied. If a site has a measured low
SCADA radio communications performance issue, the RTU's antenna height
can be adjusted upward, and if necessary the master radio site can be
adjusted upward as well. The radio surveyors travel to all the RTU
sites of interest and take field measurements with an actual RTU
version of the SCADA radio. Receiver signal strength — RSSI — along
with signal-to-noise ratio and possibly data error rate information are
documented. GPS coordinates along with distance and bearing data are
logged, which is valuable for future installation crews because it
gives them a bearing to aim what is usually a directional antenna at
each RTU. Photos of the test equipment being deployed are useful for
future reference. A
radio study can provide significant cost savings on antenna structure
costs. It can be wasteful to use a 40-foot tall antenna tower when a
20-foot one will supply the necessary RF fade margin and costs a
quarter as much. Multiply that across a 50 or 100 RTU system and the
savings are compelling. Almost all SCADA radio network projects require
a radio study. Cape
Coral case study: I have attached a PDF copy of a report we performed
recently in Cape Coral, Florida. It is representative of a SCADA radio
network radio study in many ways, yet different in a couple of ways
too. This radio study was performed in the 900 megahertz multiple
address system, which requires FCC licensing for operation. 900
megahertz RF signals can be highly unpredictable when non-line-of-sight
conditions exist, as they did in Cape Coral. This radio study took
advantage of the fact that there was an existing 300-foot tall antenna
tower located at the water plant's property that was available for use.
The SCADA designer — myself — chose to locate the SCADA master's
antenna at the 100-foot above-ground-level height on the tower. This
was likely 25 percent higher than necessary, but there was no
additional cost associated with using a tower that was already
constructed and available to the city. This mounting location was also
unused antenna tower real estate, as the other antennas on the tower
were located above the 100-foot height. The RF signal strengths to the
RTUs measured were very strong due to the high placement of the master
SCADA radio station's antenna. The farthest RTUs away from the master
were about 3 miles. Eustis
case study: If your SCADA radio network master and associated RTUs are
relatively close — within about half a mile — and the antennas are able
to see each other, then the need for a radio study is ambiguous.
However, if the antennas are not within visual sight of each other,
plan on a radio survey. A case in point was in Eustis, Florida, where I
once performed a radio study. The master radio had its antenna located
atop a 100-foot-plus tall water tank. It needed to communicate through
a pine forest to an RTU less than a mile away. Zero signal was
available until the RTU antenna cleared the 80-foot tall slash pine
trees. The city abandoned their interest in 900 MHz spread spectrum for
450 MHz licensed to mitigate this problem. The initial design would
have failed and caused cost overruns and delays that would have
made both sides frustrated if a radio study had not been performed as
part of the project. Learn from the mistakes of others — perform a
radio study when in a path-critical environment. If
you have questions on a specific project or application, call Mark
Lavallee at 954-961-2642 or email mark.lavallee@advantage-com.com. I
enjoy sharing my thirty years of experience. My company is often called
upon to subcontract with design-build consultants, assist control
system integrators, and work with end users directly. For more on the
design process before a radio study, see Design, Test, Then Build It.
954 961 2642
or email : mark.lavallee@advantage-com.com Thank you for visiting
SCADA Radio Networks Since 1993, More than 33 years of Excellence in SCADA Radio